faulker058

If you've gotten a copy you'll see something interesting somewhere in the middle there. It was so awesome she agreed to this. Look at the top of the doorway:

The Moral Theology of the Devil Thomas Merton, New Seeds of Contemplation (New York: New Directions, 1972), 90–7 The devil has a whole system of theology and philosophy, which will explain, to anyone who will listen, that created things are evil, that men are evil, that God created evil and that He directly wills that men should suffer evil. According to the devil, God rejoices in the suffering of men and, in fact, the whole universe is full of misery because God has willed and planned it that way.    Indeed, says this system of theology, God that Father took real pleasure in delivering His Son to His murderers, and God the Son came to earth because He wanted to be punished by the Father. Both of them together seek nothing more than to punish and persecute their faithful ones. As a matter of fact, in creating the world God had clearly in mind that man would inevitably sin and it was almost as if the world were created in order that man might sin, so that God would have an oppo...

On not every day of my life have the thoughts of Stanley Fish and myself been this well aligned: The insistence on the primacy of narratives and interpretations does not involve a deriding of facts but an alternative story of their emergence. Postmodernism sets itself against the notion of facts just lying there discrete and independent, and waiting to be described. Instead it argues that fact is the achievement of argument and debate, not a pre-existing entity by whose measure argument can be assessed. Arguments come first; when they are successful, facts follow — at least for a while, until a new round of arguments replaces them with a new set of facts. This is far from the picture of Nietzschean nihilism that Hanson and others paint. Friction, not free invention, is the heart of the process: You commit yourself to the standards of evidence long in place in the conversation you enter, and then you maneuver as best you can within the guidelines of those standards. Thus, for example, ...

You can now read Ecology without Nature in Japanese, Chinese, Danish and German. You can read The Ecological Thought in Chinese (and soon in French). You can read Dark Ecology and Being Ecological in Dutch. You can read Hyperobjects in Italian and Spanish (amazing covers my friends). Fairly soon there will be some more ( Being Ecological in Italian for example), and I know I'm forgetting some.

Here are some nice notes about what I'm doing at the Spencer Museum of Art in Kansas tomorrow: